How Can People Be So Stupid? Rotating Header Image

Global Governance Is Real Goal Of Global Warmingistas: Don’t Expect Free Speech Or A Free Press In Their Utopia

It has been clear to some of us for quite some time that the whole “thing” about global warming had nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics. The very fact that Al Gore is the poster child for anthropogenic global warming should be a clue to anyone, whose life and intelligence goes beyond watching American Idol and listening to anything said by Oprah Winfrey, that this is not about science. Al Gore knows very little about science and reality, based on some of his claims. If you will recall, he “invented the internet”. And, even more recently, he claimed that the temperature in the center of the earth was “millions of degrees.” PUULEEEASE! What a moron.

Of course, he showed us his famous graph of CO2 concentrations over the last 650,000 years, along with the temperature over those same 650,000 years. So far, so good. But, he showed them in a very deceptive way, so that the casual viewer could not see the true relationship between CO2 and temperature. He claimed that an increase in CO2 lead to an increase in temperature. In a recent post, I take that same data and present it in the way that a scientist would be likely to present it (if he was not trying to “hide the decline”). It show that just the opposite of what Al Gore claims is true. That data shows that temperature goes up, and then CO2 goes up. Thus, while there is a slight relationship between CO2 and temperature, CO2 levels ARE NOT the primary cause of temperature change. In fact, these graphs make it even more clear that CO2 does not drive temperatures, as the global warmingistas would have you believe, because even on a large time scale, it is clear that temperatures plummet into the various ice ages long before CO2 levels decline.

Recently, some hackers, or an inside “whistle-blower”, released over 150 megabytes of data, files, and e-mails from the CRU. These materials clearly show a pattern of deception, and a lack of scientific integrity, by the various people involved. And, these people are the scientists at the very heart of the whole global warming conspiracy. The CRU is the organization that decides what gets peer reviewed and what does not, what gets put in the IPCC reports and what does not. They are also one of the primary repositories of the raw climate temperature data, which they have done their utmost to keep private, and away from the eyes of scientists that might find problems with their analysis and methods. (Certain scientists who are not part of the global warming cabal have, on many occasions, embarrassed the global warmingistas, including NASA,  into having to change some of their results and pronouncements.)

Now, the release of these files has been very embarrassing for the global warmingistas. A natural, inquisitive press would have questions about this, but the main stream media has been amazingly (but predictably)  silent about the whole affair. When they do mention the affair, it is generally in the tone of: “Nothing to see here. Move along.” But, some journalists do have questions, and rightfully so. But, the global warmingistas will have none of that questioning in Copenhagen. They have even used armed guards to remove a journalist who bring up legitimate questions, as can be seen in the video below, where journalist Phelim McAleer tries to ask a question about the leaked CRU data of Stanford Professor Stephen Schneider. He is removed by armed guards for daring to ask the most simple and important questions about the  “science” of global warming.

And, Phelim McAleer was lucky. At least he was able to receive press credentials. Some well known journalists, such as Dr. Jerome Corsi, were completely denied press credentials.

In a previous incident in the United States, Phelim McAleer had his microphone cut off while asking Gore what he thought about a British court ruling that there were nine significant factual errors in his film, “An Inconvenient Truth”. After hemming and hawing for a while, Al Gore stated that the result was that the court “ruled in favor” of allowing British school children to see his film.  In true global warmingista style, he “hid the decline” by making it sound like the court did not find any fault with his movie. In fact, according to an article in Time Magazine:

While accepting the broad arguments of the film, the judge pointed out nine scientific errors and omissions that he believes Gore raised in the context of alarmism and exaggeration. For instance, Gore refers to a study indicating that polar bears have, in recent years, started drowning as they swim up to 60 miles (97km) in search of ice. According to Justice Burton, “The only scientific study that either side before me can find is one which indicates that four polar bears have recently been found drowned because of a storm.” He also dismissed what he called the film’s “Armageddon scenario” in which the world’s melting ice caps could cause sea levels to rise by up to 20 feet (6m) in the near future. Such a rise could take place, he said, but “only after, and over, millennia.”

There was also not sufficient evidence to back the film’s claims that global warming caused Hurricane Katrina, the melting of snows on Mount Kilimanjaro or the evaporation of most of Lake Chad, he said.

Government attorneys amended their existing teacher guidance notes following a preliminary ruling last Tuesday, and specifics of those guidelines were debated with Dimmock’s attorneys before the court. Those notes detail, on a scene-by-scene basis, the areas where teaching staffs nationwide will be required to point out opposing arguments and scientific errors. According to the guidance, which is now available on the government’s Teachernet web site, it is designed to help teaching staff “encourage their pupils to assess the validity and credibility of different information sources and explore different points of view so as to form their own opinions.”

The following two videos discuss the global warming fraud, and the fact that this is about global governance and total control of your life, not man-made global warming. (I also agree with Alex Jones that whoever did release this material should be applauded. In fact, I think Al Gore’s Nobel prize should be taken from Gore and given to whoever released the CRU data.) In the second of these two videos, at the 3:50 mark, the President of the European Union, Herman Van Rompuy (a member of the Bilderberg Group) says: “2009 is also the first year of global governance, with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet. Our mission, our presidency, is one of hope supported by acts and by deeds.”

This is the second part of the video by Alex Jones.

In the following clip, Al Gore brags about how the global warming issue will bring about “Global Governance”. This is at about the 1:05 point in the video. He then talks about energy efficiency; this from a person whose home uses 12 to 20 times as much electricity as the average American home. (And this is only after he did a lot to reduce the energy useage in that home!) And, of course, remember through all of this that Al Gore has made something like $100 million dollars off the global warming scam, and he stands to make many times that much in the coming years if this scam is not stopped.)

And, as if this is all not bad enough, and as if we have not heard from the horses’ mouths (or horses’ somethings) that the real agenda behind global warming due to man-kind’s emission of CO2 is global governance, we finally get to the admission of the head of the IPCC itself, Dr. Pachauri. In his blog, he states:

The Copenhagen Conference of the Parties to come up with an agreement on climate change is clearly not making much headway. This may be the result of frozen mindsets, strong vested interests and ignorance. The question is whether the additional time that the world would now have to arrive at an agreement at the next Conference of the Parties in Mexico will give us time and space to look at the larger problem of unsustainable development, of which climate change is at best a symptom. Human society cannot continue to ignore the vital dependence that exists between human welfare and the health of our natural resources.

In other words, climate change is not “really” the agenda. Rather, we need to slow down the development of the civilized, industrial world, and, by implication, transfer wealth to the third world nations. (And we all know what would happen if we did that. The wealth would just go into the pockets of the two bit dictators that rule many, if not most,  of the third world nations.  The people of those nations would be no better off, but their rulers would laugh all of the way to the bank. But, the globalists don’t see it that way. They simply refuse to let go of their Marxist, Utopian views.)

Finally, it is all summed up by Lord Monckton.

Leave a Reply

Maximum 2 links per comment. Do not use BBCode.