How Can People Be So Stupid? Rotating Header Image

Disgraced Head of Climategate Scandalized CRU Essentially Admits Man-made Global Warming Not Real

Since starting this blog, I have written many articles about AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming), and explained that it is a total scam; a hoax; a massive political power and money grab. It never was about the “science”; it was about the most massive transfer of wealth ever schemed in the history of the world. To myself, and many other scientists who have actually read the articles, and reviewed the facts (and “inconvenient truths”, better known as lies and distortions of science) involved in climate science, it was obvious that the science was far from settled. Even though most people in the world are not trained scientists, the mere fact that the UN (arguably one of the most corrupt organizations in the world), and Al Gore, a political animal with no scientific training, but a huge vested interest in the trading of carbon credits and other schemes that could make him hundreds of millions of dollars on the backs of Americans and other citizens of developed nations if the global warming swindle was allowed to go forward, should have given people pause for thought.

Even the fact that Al Gore and the IPCC got a Nobel Peace Prize should have made people skeptical. After all, look at others who have won that “award”.  Yasser Arafat, arguably one of the worlds’ foremost terrorists, won the award in 1994.  Henry Kissinger, who has been involved in, if not largely responsible for, much of our often wrong-headed foreign policy, including our military policies in Viet Nam and Cambodia which would not allow our soldiers to actually win the war, received the award in  1973.   Mohammad ElBaradei, who, as head of the IAEA, has given us a nuclear armed North Korea, and a soon-to-be (if not already) nuclear armed Iran, received the award in 2006. And, of course, lets not forget the latest abomination (in every respect) Barack Obama, who is rapidly increasing our involvement in wars (that he has no intention of winning) in many places in the world. Personally, I consider the Nobel Peace Prize more like a mark of dishonor, not something to be proud of or to be admired. (This criticism only applies to the Peace Prize; it does not extend to other Nobel Prizes.)

Anyway, someone did the world a great favor in November, 2009, when they released hundreds of documents and e-mails from the CRU that showed how they had distorted and corrupted the scientific process with the aim of bringing about draconian taxes and regulation that would serve no actual useful purpose, other than a massive transfer of wealth. As a result of this scandal, Phil Jones, the head of the CRU, stepped down.

In a February 14, 2010 article in the Daily Mail Online, Jones made some revealing statements about the whole issue of climate change.   For one thing, he admitted that for the past 15 years, there has been no “statistically significant” warming. This, of course, in spite of the fact that all of the global warmingistas’ models suggested strong warming during that time period due to increases in CO2. (The graph below is from an earlier article of mine.)


And, of course, lets not forget the term “models”. We keep hearing how the “science is settled”, and all of the “models” predict strong global warming due to rising CO2 levels. Um, it seems to me that if the “science is settled”, there should be one “model”, not “models”. Of course, as those of us who have followed the “debate” have known for years, there are many places, and some very critical, where the “models” don’t predict reality. In some of those cases, the reality (measured data) is discarded as being “incorrect”; nobody seems to realize, or at least admit, that there may be some problems with the “models” that clearly don’t predict reality. (And one fault of the “models” is that they do not take into account clouds! And, of course, clouds are related to the strongest greenhouse gas, which is water vapor!) (A good treatise about clouds, and what may actually control them, can be found here.) This presentation may lie at the true heart of climate change, as it presents in a very clear way the relationship between cosmic rays (which more and more are believed to control clouds) and global temperatures. Of course, you won’t hear about this from the global warmingistas, since they cannot tax cosmic rays. In fact, as is pointed out in this article, an excellent paper that explained this whole relationship was rejected in peer review. Gee, I wonder why? Of course, now that we know that the global warmingistas took over control of the peer review process, and effectively blocked any papers that they felt were damaging to their “cause”, the rejection of such a paper is easy to understand. And, as I showed in a followup to that article, the predictions made a few years ago have been holding true since the paper was rejected!

But then, in the Daily Mail article, Phil Jones makes a truly startling admission. For years, the global warmingistas have been telling us that current temperatures are “unprecedented”. They wrote off the “little ice age” and the “Medieval Warm Period” as myths, or, at best, as very localized events. But, in the article Phil Jones states:

‘There is much debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period was global in extent or not. The MWP is most clearly expressed in parts of North America, the North Atlantic and Europe and parts of Asia.‘For it to be global in extent, the MWP would need to be seen clearly in more records from the tropical regions and the Southern hemisphere. There are very few palaeoclimatic records for these latter two regions.

‘Of course, if the MWP was shown to be global in extent and as warm or warmer than today, then obviously the late 20th Century warmth would not be unprecedented. On the other hand, if the MWP was global, but was less warm than today, then the current warmth would be unprecedented.’

Well, as I showed in an earlier article, the Medieval Warm Period was real, and was well documented to be a world wide event.  The graphic below from that article shows some of the multiple scientific studies that establish the Medieval Warm Period as a period that was at least as warm, and probably warmer than, today. This graphic, which just shows a small assortment of the multitude of scientific studies that have verified the Medieval Warm Period is from Science Skeptical Blog.


Well, there you have it, straight from the former head of the CRU; man-made global warming is a lie. So, lets stop wasting time and money on an imaginary problem, and lets devote those resources to real, genuine problems. It’s not like we don’t have enough of them.


  1. Gore and The UN IPCC should be forced to give back their Nobel Peace Prize. The flaws in Gore’s film and the errors in the 2007 UN IPCC Report that have been discovered since the award was given should disqualify both parties. Irena Sendler who risked her life daily during World War II to save the lives of over 2,500 Jewish children is much more deserving. Please sign the petition to demand that Gore and the UN IPCC have their award taken away.

  2. Brian H says:

    Similar to the Big Lie strategy, the Big Theft and the Big Coup techniques count on being able to achieve a “tipping point” of scope, above which no one can or dares challenge the final outcome.

    This is so dangerous a prospect that there must be no easing or letup in the assaults on the AGW/NWO nexus. Every claim and initiative must be challenged and opposed both on immediate pragmatic and fundamental principle grounds.

    Never, ever, ever quit or give up!

Leave a Reply

Maximum 2 links per comment. Do not use BBCode.