How Can People Be So Stupid? Rotating Header Image

Ft. Hood Massacre Is Just The Politically Correct Pigeons Coming Home To Roost

The tragedy in Ft. Hood should never have happened. Many people have warned about just this kind of treachery from Muslims. But, organizations like CAIR (Conspiring Assortment of Islamist Reactionaries) have convinced the main stream media, and even the government itself, that Islam is a “religion of peace”. Of course, any thinking American knows that cannot be true, because behind almost every major conflict in the world, as well as virtually every man-made mass casualty event in the world, is a Muslim or two (or 19). So, common sense says Islam is NOT a “religion of peace”. (Maybe a religion of pieces, but not of peace.)

Just how absurd is the state of affairs in the government of the United States when it comes to matters of Islamic relations, and understanding our enemy? One thing that Nidal Hasan reportedly said that is true is that the “war on terror” is really an attack on Islam. It was reported in that he said this. I would say he is correct in that assessment. After all, we are not targeting Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, or Mormons. Clearly, we are targeting Muslims. And, that is because Muslims are targeting us! The Koran says that it is the duty of every Muslim to wage jihad (war) against the unbelievers until there are no unbelievers.

“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” — Koran 9:29

“Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children. When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them….If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.” — Sahih Muslim 4294

It is interesting to note that Nidal Hasan quoted some of these same verses in his recently discovered Power Point presentation “The Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the US Military”.

Of course, this is not politically correct to say. We must say that we are at war with “radical Islam”, or “al Qaeda”, or the “Taliban” or “Islamists”. But, what is al Qaeda? What is the “Taliban”? Most importantly, what is “radical Islam”, and what is an “Islamist”? They are people who believe the Koran is a holy book, dictated to their insane, epileptic, barbarian, pedophile “prophet” Mohammad by the angel Gabriel. They believe that Mohammad was the “perfect man” al-insan al-kamil, and they believe that they must live their lives according to the Koran and the Hadiths (the sayings of Mohammad), and follow the teachings and life of Mohammad. In other words, they are “good” Muslims who follow the teachings of their prophet.

To quote Major Nidal Malik Hasan from his above-mentioned Power Point presentation, an “Islamist: Advocates rule by Gods law–Islamic political rule/Sharia law i.e. (No separation of Church and State).” According to a 2007 poll, 37% of 16 to 24 year-olds in Great Britain would prefer to live under Sharia law. In the over 55 group, the percentage was only 17%, but that is still a huge percentage in a modern, secular, western nation. According to a report by the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding titled “A Portrait of Detroit Mosques: Muslim Views on Policy, Politics and Religion“: “Over 80% of mosque participants would like to see an enhachanced (sic) role for Islamic Law in Muslim lands.” That is truly scary. Of course, the United States is not a Muslim land (at least not yet), but I suspect many Muslims wish it were. If that is true, then the implications are terrifying. And, as I will show later, major Muslim organizations fully intend to turn the United States, as well as the rest of the civilized world,  into a Muslim land.

An additional note of interest is the fact that Nidal Hasan’s business card contained the following after his name:


Fort Hood ShootingsSoA means Soldier of Allah. Muslims often follow Allah with SWT (as he does, frequently, in his Power Point presentation.) SWT means “Subhanahu Wa Ta’ala”, or “Glory to Him, the Exalted”.

This creates a problem. What is a Muslim? Is a Muslim a person who believes that the Koran is the revealed word of “Allah”, and that Mohammad was the perfect man, to be emulated in every way? If so, then every Muslim is a potential terrorist, and thus an enemy, by any definition. If a person does not believe that Mohammad was the perfect man (al-Insān al-Kāmil), and that the Koran is not the word of “Allah”, but just a fairytale, then is that person a Muslim? If so, I would call them a “MINO”. That is, a Muslim In Name Only. That would be fairly harmless, and we would certainly not be at war with them.

This phenomena is prevalent in most religions. That is, I do not believe that most “Christians” actually believe that there was a guy who was born of a virgin and who was crucified and arose from the dead. Or that the earth was created some 6000 years ago, in 6 days and 6 nights. I know there are scientifically illiterate people out there who honestly believe that everything in the Bible is true, but I don’t think that most “Christians” actually believe the Bible is a totally accurate historical volume, no matter what they claim in public.  (After all, if they really believed it, and thought there was an afterlife in heaven, why are so many Christians afraid of death? If they believed the Bible, then death would be something to look forward to. And, by the way, as Hasan points out in his Power Point presentation, “We (Muslims) love death more then (sic) you love life!”. This is an oft-repeated phrase by Muslims, and there must be some truth to it since they seem to like to blow themselves up.) I think the majority of Christians are just “CINO’s”; Christians In Name Only. They pick and choose what they want to believe. Mostly, they believe that if they live a good life, and live by the teachings of Jesus, they will “go to heaven” when they die. (Or so they profess.) They believe that self-sacrifice and helping others is blessed, and they believe that killing, raping, stealing, etc. are bad. Fine. Who could argue with that? Those beliefs are what has allowed mankind to advance to our present state of civilization. (Although you certainly don’t need for there to be a God to believe in those beliefs and values; it’s just common sense, and allows civilized people to live together in peace and prosperity.)

The real problem is with Islam. It is not like Christianity. There is no “turn the other cheek”. The Koran is very specific. It says there are two worlds, Dar al-Harb (the house of war), and Dar al-Islam (the house of Islam).   It is stated that there will be no peace until there is no dar al-Harb, or, until there are no “non-Muslims”, or at least until any non-Muslims are Dhimmi’s, paying the Jizya, and subjugated. (In Muslim nations, Dhimmis are third class citizens. Muslim women are second class citizens in Muslim lands.)

There are serious problems beyond the obvious with having Muslims serve in the government, or in the military. Muslims often consider themselves “Muslims first, and whatever else second.” In fact, Nidal Hasan said “I’m a Muslim first and an American second”, according to Dr. Val Finnel, a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force, according to a LA Times article. This is a sentiment felt by many Muslims in many countries. Thus, their allegiance can obviously not be trusted, thus making them ineligible for any position of responsibility in the military or in government.

We’ve seen other similar treachery from Muslims in the military, such as the atrocity committed by Hasan Karim Akbar, which resulted in one American soldier being killed, and 15 others injured. There have been other acts of treachery committed by Muslims entrusted by our military and civilian establishment. And, who can forget the duplicitous acts of Islamic translators, who deliberately mistranslated documents so as to protect other Muslims. Or, they simply slowed down the pace of their work, so as to impede terrorist investigations. And, to make matters worse, these Arabic translators, employed by the United States, with top secret clearances, were observed celebrating 9/11. Cheered one translator:  “It’s about time they got a taste of what they’ve been giving the Middle East.”

Another sinister aspect of this duplicity on the part of Muslims in the government and the military was the firing of Major Stephen Coughlin. According to an article in the Washington Times, by Bill Gertz:

Stephen Coughlin, the Pentagon specialist on Islamic law and Islamist extremism, has been fired from his position on the military’s Joint Staff. The action followed a report in this space last week revealing opposition to his work for the military by pro-Muslim officials within the office of Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England.

Mr. Coughlin was notified this week that his contract with the Joint Staff will end in March, effectively halting the career of one of the U.S. government’s most important figures in analyzing the nature of extremism and ultimately preparing to wage ideological war against it.

He had run afoul of a key aide to Mr. England, Hasham Islam, who confronted Mr. Coughlin during a meeting several weeks ago when Mr. Islam sought to have Mr. Coughlin soften his views on Islamist extremism.

Mr. Coughlin was accused directly by Mr. Islam of being a Christian zealot or extremist “with a pen,” according to defense officials. Mr. Coughlin appears to have become one of the first casualties in the war of ideas with Islamism.

The officials said Mr. Coughlin was let go because he had become “too hot” or controversial within the Pentagon.

As the Washington Times article goes on to explain, the real reason Muslims pressured the administration to fire Coughlin was because:

Mr. Coughlin wrote a memorandum several months ago based on documents made public in a federal trial in Dallas that revealed a covert plan by the Muslim Brotherhood, an Egyptian-origin Islamist extremist group, to subvert the United States using front groups. Members of one of the identified front groups, the Islamic Society of North America, has been hosted by Mr. England at the Pentagon.

In other words, he was trying to warn the government about what many of us already knew. That organizations like CAIR, ISAN (Islamic Society of North America), and others, are nothing but front groups for the Muslim Brotherhood. This fact became explosively clear with the recent publication of Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that’s Conspiring to Islamize America.

Three chilling excerpts from a 1991 document titled “And Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America”, by Mohamed Akramn, were exposed by The Investigative Project on Terrorism,  The Brotherhood refers to the Shura Council of the Muslim Brotherhood.

  • Enablement of Islam in North America, meaning: establishing an effective and stable Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brotherhood which adopts Muslims’ causes domestically and globally, and which works to expand the observant Muslim base, aims at unifying and directing Muslims’ efforts, presents Islam as a civilization alternative, and supports the global Islamic state, wherever it is.
  • In order for Islam and its Movement to become “a part of the homeland” in which it lives, “stable” in its land, “rooted” in the spirits and minds of its people, “enabled” in the live [sic] of its society and has firmly-established “organizations” on which the Islamic structure is built and with which the testimony of civilization is achieved, the Movement must plan and struggle to obtain “the keys” and the tools of this process in carry [sic] out this grand mission as a “Civilization Jihadist” responsibility which lies on the shoulders of Muslims and – on top of them – the Muslim Brotherhood in this country.
  • The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Proecess” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal.

We are doomed.

One Comment

  1. forex robot says:

    great post as usual .. thanks .. you just gave me a few more ideas to play with

Leave a Reply

Maximum 2 links per comment. Do not use BBCode.