How Can People Be So Stupid? Rotating Header Image

Good News: Axe Wielding Somalian Shot At Kurt Westergaard’s House–Bad News: The Muslim Attacker Survives To Attack Again

This news was just released by CNN on January 1, 2010.

(CNN) — A Somali man was shot as he allegedly tried to enter the home of Danish political cartoonist Kurt Westergaard — known for his controversial depictions of the Muslim prophet Mohammad — on Saturday, police said.

The 27-year-old man, who was not identified, wielded an ax and a knife and cracked a window at Westergaard’s home in Aarhus, said police spokesman Morten Jensen. A home alarm alerted police to the scene at 10 p.m., and they were attacked by the man, he said.

The officers shot the man in the right leg and left hand. He was hospitalized, but was not seriously injured, police said.

Westergaard’s caricature of Mohammed — which depicted the prophet wearing a bomb as a turban with a lit fuse — sparked an uproar among Muslims in early 2006 after newspapers reprinted the images months later as a matter of free speech. The cartoon was first published by the Danish newspaper Morgenavisen Jullands-Posten in September 2005.

Of course, most Americans have no idea what this is all about, because most of the main stream media totally obfuscated the story in 2005 and into 2006. The only  main stream media publication, that I know of, in the United States, to publish the cartoons was the Philadelphia Enquirer. While I am not a fan of the Philly Enquirer (or any newspaper), I have to give them a lot of credit for having the journalistic integrity to at least publish the cartoons that caused so many deaths by followers of an insane, epileptic, barbarian, pedophile named Mohammad. How insane are these people, to go on rampages about harmless cartoons? Did Christians riot, loot, and kill when Jesus was depicted in dung? How many disparaging cartoons and outrages have been committed against Jesus, and other characters beloved by Christians? Many. But, you don’t see Christians rioting, looting, and killing over them. Christians had a reformation, and got over that stuff a few hundred years ago (thank God!)

In fact, the political correctness and fear of Muslims has gone so far that Yale University Press prevented the publication of the Mohammad cartoons in a book about the Mohammad cartoons. How totally absurd is that? If I was the author, I would have told my publisher to go fuck themselves. Unfortunately, the author of this book did not do that. I guess the author needed the money. I discuss this situation in my article “Disgraceful Dhimmitude: Yale University Press Afraid To Publish Muhammad Cartoons In Book About Muhammad Cartoons!” In this post, I include the cartoons in question, along with a few that are more “controversial”. (My favorite is “Mohammad Invents a New Religion”.) Anyway, the one with Mohammad with a bomb in his turban was the one that generated so much “angst” among the pious, “peaceful” Muslims. They claimed that it made Mohammad look like a terrorist. Well, DUH, he was a terrorist! He spent much of his life as a barbarian warrior, killing many (preferably by decapitation) while he, unfortunately, walked the earth. And, his barbarous  legacy continues. Lets face it, 99 times out of 100, when you hear about some bombing or other atrocity committed in the world, there is a Muslim involved.  I am not saying that every Muslim is a terrorist, but virtually every terrorist is a Muslim. A couple of decades ago, it was not so clear, since there were a lot of IRA terrorists committing atrocities. But today, terrorism is almost exclusively the domain of the Muslims. I was not politically aware in the age of the IRA, so I can’t comment on that situation, but it seems to have been resolved, or at least contained. In the case of the Muslims, as the attempted bombing of Northwest flight 253 on Christmas day proves, they are still 7th century barbarians.

It is a shame that Kurt Westergaard does not live in the United States. If he lived here, he would have a right to bear arms; that is, a right to protect himself. If the attack had happened here, Kurt could have dispatched the Somali attacker to his imaginary 72 virgins; in stead, the police arrived and only wounded the attacker, thus allowing him to attack, again. I am amazed that Kurt is still alive. It does speak volumes about the apparent ability of the police in Denmark. But, Denmark is small; what is the expected police response time? I don’t know. In most of America, police response time would be tens of minutes, at least, which would translate to death for the attacked, unless they were armed.

This situation is not only a further indictment of Muslims, but it is another reason why the 2nd amendment is so vitally important. I’m actually surprised that the police got to Westergaard’s house quickly enough to save his life. Lets face it, it only takes a few seconds for an assailant to enter you house. If you can’t defend yourself, your chances are not good. Theo van Gogh found that out on the streets of Holland, when he was brutally stabbed in the chest by a crazed Muslim after making the film “Submission” with Ayan Hirsi Ali, one of the most courageous people to leave Islam. I recommend all of her books. I also show “Fitna” on my site, by Geert Wilders, an incredibly courageous Danish parliamentarian. I do not show “Submission” only because it has some nudity, and thus might not be appropriate to viewers of all ages. It is a great movie, however, and you can find it if you want to.


  1. I can tell you what the police response time here in Australia is to a house invasion – 2 hours and 10 minutes. I was home at the time and during late afternoon 3 housebreakers in their mid twenties tried to break in to my home. One stood in the back corner of the yard obviously keeping watch down 2 sides. One was removing screen from the main bedroom window and breaking a window. A third was breaking a window in my study. Being well armed I was not unduly alarmed so I rang the police. They did not seem to be very interested so to make it clear I said there are 3 men simultaneously breaking into my house NOW and I do not know if they are armed.

    Having little faith in a response I grabbed my shotgun and walked up to the bedroom window where a head and chest had just appeared as the theif was preparing to jump into the room. Instead he found himself looking down 2 barrels of an over under 12 guage. He fell backwards from the window and ran for his life whereupon the the remaining 2 hearing the ruckus ran as well. I would have liked ot have shot him fair in the face as his mouth gaped open in shock at the barrel which appeared miraculously only inches from him but unfortunately I would be in jail now if I did.

    The police arrived 2 hours and 10 minutes later. After I got stuck into them for the response time I said I was sorry to interupt their donut break and they were not needed here as I had taken care of the three. They seemed to disbelieve me until I showed them the broken windows and screens. Of course I didn’t mention the firearm as in Australia even producing it as I did would have had serious consequences.

    The police can rarely protect you – they can only clean up the mess afterwards.

    Mr Westergaard was very lucky but due to his background any alarms from his residence are probably reacted to more quickly than for an ordinary member of the public. Here police would drive straight by a home alarm without a second glance.

    A people, such as in my country, that give up the right to arm and protect their most treasured possession – their life – are a subjugated people with no freedom. Such peoples deserve the inevitable fate that one day awaits them. The foundation of freedom is the freedom to protect your life from those who would take it.

    America, to a large extent, still retains that freedom and is one of the few remaining bastions of liberty on the planet which is one of several reasons (oh goodness dare I say this) I love America and the American Republic.

  2. Moss says:

    Ritual murder, human sacrifice and blood offerings to Allah the moon-demon:

  3. admin says:

    I had thought that firearms were made illegal in Australia a few years. I remember reading that politicians were shocked to see violent crime go up after the ban. (Typical liberal stupidity to think banning guns will make crime go down. The opposite is the logical result, since if guns are illegal, then only criminals will have guns. Thus, they will have less trepidation about attacking people, since they believe those people will not be armed.)
    After the police saw that people had, indeed, tried to break into you house, and that you had “taken care of it”, they must have surmised you had a gun. I guess the official attitude in Australia on firearms, if nobody is injured, is “don’t ask, don’t tell?”.
    Personally, just the sound of a 12 guage shell getting racked into the chamber of a pump action shot gun would send me running, if I was a burglar, or other type of criminal about to commit a crime.

Leave a Reply

Maximum 2 links per comment. Do not use BBCode.